texas holdem big blind little blind rules

I find it still odd that TDA wouldn't be very specific in their own rules that address this. The rationale: In poker, position has value but chips have more value. When play becomes heads-up, the player who had the big blind the most recently is given the button, and his opponent is given the big blind.'Īs you can see, in RRoP it is very clear that when heads-up both the SB and BB are always paid and that the Button is always moved to the player who most recently paid the BB.Ĭarol was BB most recently. 'In heads-up play with two blinds, the small blind is on the button. These include many of the details found in other references, such as Robert's Rules of Poker version 11. I have often found that TDA Rules do not include details that a majority of members consider to be common knowledge. (unless TDA has rule that SB would be payed twice in multiple player action as well, and would be small blind and button, which I don't think is the case but I can't find it in the rules.

If more players are in a hand when the BB is eliminated there is no subsequent SB, so why would it be different when you are going from 3 players to 2. That is, Alice becomes BB as she would if Carol had not been eliminated, but Bob would be the Button, and there would be no small blind (position that Carol was in would have been SB, but was eliminated). Question I have is why isn't there no small blind in this situation. So, my understanding is that BB moves to Alice and Bob is small blind (again) and the button. But, this is the correct button movement and blinds I am quite sure.īut, I am less sure of the rationale for the situation when:Ģ. I understand this as BB must move, though creates inequity in that Bob has to act first post-flop two hands in a row. So BB travels to Bob, Carol becomes the SB and the button. 2 questions on dead button / blind movement when going from 3 players to two.ġ.

Texas holdem big blind little blind rules